Home Political Spin Unqualified Zero Experience Mistruths & lies Webmaster Note

Warren Stracener Admitts to Fabricating His Resume.

 

Article Date: May 22, 2012

The Mountain Democrat sums it up best with this statement: “Contrary to this, when he met with the Mountain Democrat editorial board he specifically stated he did not "appear" before the U.S. Supreme Court. He was certified to appear before the U.S. Supreme Court, but the one case he had he "argued on paper," he told us.”

 

http://www.mtdemocrat.com/opinion/overstated/

 

Warren Stracener also admitted to the Village Life newspaper that he has not appeared before the United States Supreme Court. This was one of Stracener’s claim to being the most qualified and he has said on multiple occasions that he has appeared before the US Supreme Court, including his candidate statement, his website (as of May 22, 2012) his two campaign handouts and in his campaign mailer. Those statements were flat out lies!

Warren Stracener’s defense is just full of hot air. He was quoted as saying ““People assume ‘appearance’ means oral argument,” he said, but the vast majority of non-criminal cases are “decided on papers…You don’t have to go in and argue,” he added. “I argued and won it at trial, then won it on papers in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and, eventually, the U.S. Supreme Court.””-excerpt is from the Village Life Link below.

 

http://www.villagelife.com/news/stracener-responds-to-accusations/

 

You just can not trust Warren Stracener.

 

Warren Stracener Campaigns on the Taxpayers Dime.

 

Warren Stracener talks a good game when it comes to saving taxpayer’s money, but his actions show a blatant disregard for court funds. Warren Stracener has been taking off Tuesdays and Thursdays to perform “community outreach”, aka campaigning. And who pays for this, the taxpayer.

 

Add to his salary and the traveling judge who is paid $708 a day to handle his court while he isn’t there and the taxpayer has to front a large bill for Warren Stracener campaign activities.

State lawyers to argue to not get paid?

 

Warren Stracener talks out both sides of his mouth, first sounding like the noble public servant, secondarily assured he will be laughing his way to the bank when the tax payers look the other way.

- State lawyers often complain that they're underpaid. Well, if the governor's lawsuit against the controller continues, counsel for both sides may actually wind up working pro bono.

So technically, DPA chief counsel K. William Curtis, deputy chief counsel Warren Stracener, assistant chief counsel Linda Mayhew and labor relations counsel Christopher Thomas will be arguing that they shouldn't be getting paid.

(OK, even if the lawyers' salaries are withheld they'll receive back pay once a budget is signed, so technically they're not working for free. But you can see where this creates a strange courtroom dynamic.) -

 

August 12, 2008 writings of: Cheryl Miller on the Legal Pad Blog

 

Warren Stracener stretched the truth again by stating he has heard over 2000 cases between Dependency and Delinquency matters when in reality he has heard 645 cases.

We found a new one. Per status quo Warren Stracener stretched the truth again. The Mountain Democrat “He told the Tea Party listeners he’s heard over 2,000 matters in dependency and delinquency court”. But here’s the kicker, almost half of the delinquency matters have been heard by another Judge.

“He told the Tea Party listeners he’s heard over 2,000 matters in dependency and delinquency court, plus over 5,000 traffic cases. “I decided every case and not one has been reversed,” he said”.
http://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/two-challenge-appointee-for-superior-court-seat/ 

Here is how it all breaks down: 

2011 juvenile Dependency cases filed: 169 
2011 Juvenile Dependency cases modified: 45 
2011 Juvenile Dependency cases total: 214

2011 Juvenile Delinquency cases filed: 272 
2011 Juvenile Delinquency cases modified/VOP: 498 
2011 Juvenile Delinquency cases total: 770 
2011 Juvenile Delinquency cases heard in another court: approx. 385 

2012 Juvenile Delinquency cases filed: 29 
2012 Juvenile Delinquency cases modified/VOP: 63 
2012 Juvenile Delinquency cases total: 92 
2012 Juvenile Delinquency cases heard in another court: 46 
(2012 stats current to March) 

A judge should have the highest ethics and unquestioned honesty. Unfortunately Warren Stracerner’s ambition seems to conflict with his honesty.

Another Loose Relationship with the truth?

 

Warren Stracener casually shrugs off the Kindertown reversal he received from the California Court of Appeal attempting to bamboozle the voters with his explanation of a "Palma Notice". Truth is; a Palma Notice is a higher court sending a message down to a lower court of what is about to happen.

Palma notice: a Palma notice strongly suggesting that the court of appeal will grant a peremptory writ. It all but tells the real party not to bother filing a response.

Source: What Every Lawyer Should Know about Responding to a Writ Petition by Cynthia Tobisman

Warren Stracener - NO TAX PAYERS SAVINGS


Warren Stracener claimed he saved the states millions of dollars with furloughs, when in fact that is not true